Tariff

Previous

Next

TWP Pipeline LLC
FERC GAS TARIFF
SECOND REVISED VOLUME NO. 1

SECTION 7.9
SCHEDULING PRIORITY
VERSION 3.0.0

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS


    7.9.  SCHEDULING PRIORITY
    
        7.9.1.  If Transporter is unable on any day to satisfy all nominations 
                for service, then Transporter will schedule service in the 
                following order of priority from first scheduled to last scheduled:
    
                1.  First, nominations within Shipper's MDQ from Primary 
                    Receipt Points and Primary Delivery Points under Rate 
                    Schedule FT; if all such nominations cannot be satisfied, 
                    Transporter shall schedule nominations within this 
                    priority level pro rata based on nominated quantities 
                    with Shipper's MDQ.
    
                2.  Second, nominations within Shipper's MDQ from Secondary 
                    Receipt Points or Secondary Delivery Points under Rate 
                    Schedule FT; if all such nominations cannot be satisfied, 
                    Transporter shall schedule nominations within this priority 
                    level pro rata based on nominated quantities within 
                    Shipper's MDQ.    
    
                3.  Third, AOS under Rate Schedule FT and nominations under Rate 
                    Schedule IT, if all such nominations cannot be satisfied, 
                    Transporter shall schedule nominations within this priority 
                    level by price from highest to lowest; provided that 
                    scheduling will be pro rata based on nominated quantities 
                    among Shippers paying the same rate; and provided further 
                    that, for purposes of scheduling nominations under this 
                    section, Negotiated Rates that exceed the maximum Recourse 
                    Rate will be treated as though equal to the maximum 
                    Recourse Rate.
    
                4.  Fourth, any other nominations for services under this Tariff.
    
        7.9.2.  Transporter shall use service requester provided rankings when 
                making reductions during the scheduling and curtailment process when 
                this does not conflict with tariff-based rules.  Pursuant to NAESB 
                Standard 2.3.26, the time limitation for disputes of allocations 
                shall be six (6) months from the date of the initial month-end 
                allocation with a three (3) month rebuttal period.  This standard 
                shall not apply in the case of deliberate omission or 
                misrepresentation or mutual mistake of fact.  Parties' other 
                statutory or contractual rights shall not otherwise be diminished 
                by this standard.

Previous

Next